Demographics details for Laconia, NH vs Moscow, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Laconia, NH vs Moscow, ID.
| Data | Laconia | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,086 | 26,249 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 24.8 years |
| Median Income | $67,856 | $53,679 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Laconia vs Moscow
- The population in Moscow is higher at 26,249, compared to 17,086 in Laconia.
- Residents in Laconia have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 24.8 years in Moscow.
- Laconia has a higher median income of $67,856 compared to $53,679 in Moscow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Laconia at 37.0% compared to 28.0% in Moscow.
- The poverty level is higher in Moscow at 15%, compared to 9% in Laconia.
- Moscow has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.4% in Laconia.
Demographics
Demographics Laconia vs Moscow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Laconia | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 93 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Laconia vs Moscow
- In Moscow, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Laconia.
- Laconia has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 83% in Moscow.
- In Moscow, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Laconia.
- Moscow has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Laconia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moscow at 6%, compared to 2% in Laconia.
- In Moscow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Laconia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Laconia | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Laconia vs Moscow
- More residents in Laconia report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.4% in Moscow.
- Depression is more prevalent in Laconia at 24.9% compared to 24.5% in Moscow.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Laconia at 17.2% compared to 13.6% in Moscow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moscow at 17.1% compared to 16.6% in Laconia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Laconia at 31.5% compared to 31.2% in Moscow.
- Disability percentages are higher in Laconia at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Moscow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Laconia | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (61) | 0.3% (80) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (3,229) | 5.7% (1,492) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (2,158) | 2.0% (515) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (3,364) | 25.8% (6,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Laconia vs Moscow
- A higher percentage of residents in Laconia have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Moscow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Laconia hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 5.7% in Moscow.
- More residents in Laconia have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 2.0% in Moscow.
- In Moscow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 19.7% in Laconia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.