Demographics details for La puente, CA vs Texarkana, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La puente, CA vs Texarkana, TX.
| Data | La puente | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,636 | 35,778 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $77,702 | $48,054 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: La puente vs Texarkana
- In La puente, the population is higher at 36,636, compared to 35,778 in Texarkana.
- The median age in Texarkana is higher at 37.2 years, compared to 36.4 years in La puente.
- La puente has a higher median income of $77,702 compared to $48,054 in Texarkana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in La puente at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Texarkana.
- The poverty level is higher in Texarkana at 15%, compared to 12% in La puente.
- The unemployment rate in La puente is higher at 5.9%, compared to 5.0% in Texarkana.
Demographics
Demographics La puente vs Texarkana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | La puente | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 39 |
| White | -16 | 46 |
| Asian | 14 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 84 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 4 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: La puente vs Texarkana
- In Texarkana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 2% in La puente.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Texarkana at 46% compared to -16% in La puente.
- The Asian population is larger in La puente at 14% compared to 2% in Texarkana.
- The Hispanic community is larger in La puente at 84% compared to 9% in Texarkana.
- More residents identify as two or more races in La puente at 13% compared to 4% in Texarkana.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in La puente at 3% compared to 0% in Texarkana.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | La puente | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La puente vs Texarkana
- In Texarkana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.8% in La puente.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Texarkana at 23.4% versus 15.3% in La puente.
- Texarkana has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 11.8% in La puente.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Texarkana at 16.0% compared to 14.5% in La puente.
- Texarkana has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 31.6% in La puente.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Texarkana at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in La puente.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | La puente | Texarkana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.0% (1,841) | 0.9% (324) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (6,830) | 17.6% (6,286) |
| Less than High School | 44.3% (16,244) | 11.9% (4,243) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (2,926) | 15.9% (5,688) |
Education Levels Comparison: La puente vs Texarkana
- A higher percentage of residents in La puente have no formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 0.9% in Texarkana.
- A higher percentage of residents in La puente hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 17.6% in Texarkana.
- More residents in La puente have less than a high school education at 44.3% compared to 11.9% in Texarkana.
- In Texarkana, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 8.0% in La puente.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.