Demographics details for La puente, CA vs South river, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La puente, CA vs South river, NJ.
| Data | La puente | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,636 | 15,990 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $77,702 | $95,981 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: La puente vs South river
- In La puente, the population is higher at 36,636, compared to 15,990 in South river.
- The median age in South river is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 36.4 years in La puente.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981, compared to $77,702 in La puente.
- In South river, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 38.0% in La puente.
- La puente has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in South river.
- The unemployment rate in La puente is higher at 5.9%, compared to 4.2% in South river.
Demographics
Demographics La puente vs South river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | La puente | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 7 |
| White | -16 | 50 |
| Asian | 14 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 84 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 7 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: La puente vs South river
- In South river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 2% in La puente.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South river at 50% compared to -16% in La puente.
- The Asian population is larger in La puente at 14% compared to 5% in South river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in La puente at 84% compared to 30% in South river.
- More residents identify as two or more races in La puente at 13% compared to 7% in South river.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in La puente at 3% compared to 1% in South river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | La puente | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La puente vs South river
- In South river, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in La puente.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South river at 21.0% versus 15.3% in La puente.
- South river has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 11.8% in La puente.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South river at 16.0% compared to 14.5% in La puente.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 31.6%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South river at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in La puente.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | La puente | South river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.0% (1,841) | 2.5% (394) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (6,830) | 18.7% (2,985) |
| Less than High School | 44.3% (16,244) | 20.6% (3,292) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (2,926) | 18.9% (3,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: La puente vs South river
- A higher percentage of residents in La puente have no formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 2.5% in South river.
- In South river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 18.6% in La puente.
- More residents in La puente have less than a high school education at 44.3% compared to 20.6% in South river.
- In South river, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 8.0% in La puente.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.