Demographics details for La puente, CA vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in La puente, CA vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data La puente Massapequa park
Population 36,636 16,873
Median Age 36.4 years 43.7 years
Median Income $77,702 $161,193
Married Families 38.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.9 3.5

Population Comparison: La puente vs Massapequa park

  • In La puente, the population is higher at 36,636, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 36.4 years in La puente.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $77,702 in La puente.
  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 38.0% in La puente.
  • La puente has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate in La puente is higher at 5.9%, compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics La puente vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic La puente Massapequa park
Black 2 1
White -16 88
Asian 14 2
Hispanic 84 5
Two or More Races 13 4
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: La puente vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in La puente at 2% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to -16% in La puente.
  • The Asian population is larger in La puente at 14% compared to 2% in Massapequa park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in La puente at 84% compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in La puente at 13% compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in La puente at 3% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric La puente Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 13.4% 8.0%
Depression 15.3% 17.9%
Smoking 11.8% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 19.2%
Obesity 31.6% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: La puente vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in La puente report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Massapequa park at 17.9% versus 15.3% in La puente.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in La puente at 11.8% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 14.5% in La puente.
  • Obesity rates are higher in La puente at 31.6% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in La puente at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level La puente Massapequa park
No Schooling 5.0% (1,841) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 18.6% (6,830) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 44.3% (16,244) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.0% (2,926) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: La puente vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of residents in La puente have no formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in La puente hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents in La puente have less than a high school education at 44.3% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 8.0% in La puente.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.