Demographics details for La puente, CA vs Columbus, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La puente, CA vs Columbus, IN.
| Data | La puente | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,636 | 51,268 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $77,702 | $75,114 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: La puente vs Columbus
- The population in Columbus is higher at 51,268, compared to 36,636 in La puente.
- Residents in La puente have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 35.8 years in Columbus.
- La puente has a higher median income of $77,702 compared to $75,114 in Columbus.
- In Columbus, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in La puente.
- La puente has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Columbus.
- The unemployment rate in La puente is higher at 5.9%, compared to 4.0% in Columbus.
Demographics
Demographics La puente vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | La puente | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | -16 | 71 |
| Asian | 14 | 13 |
| Hispanic | 84 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: La puente vs Columbus
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both La puente and Columbus at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Columbus at 71% compared to -16% in La puente.
- The Asian population is larger in La puente at 14% compared to 13% in Columbus.
- The Hispanic community is larger in La puente at 84% compared to 9% in Columbus.
- More residents identify as two or more races in La puente at 13% compared to 5% in Columbus.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in La puente at 3% compared to 0% in Columbus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | La puente | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 15.3% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La puente vs Columbus
- More residents in La puente report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.6% in Columbus.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Columbus at 24.1% versus 15.3% in La puente.
- Columbus has a higher smoking rate at 16.3% compared to 11.8% in La puente.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Columbus at 16.3% compared to 14.5% in La puente.
- Columbus has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 31.6% in La puente.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Columbus at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in La puente.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | La puente | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.0% (1,841) | 0.8% (398) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (6,830) | 14.3% (7,340) |
| Less than High School | 44.3% (16,244) | 9.1% (4,677) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (2,926) | 28.1% (14,382) |
Education Levels Comparison: La puente vs Columbus
- A higher percentage of residents in La puente have no formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 0.8% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in La puente hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 14.3% in Columbus.
- More residents in La puente have less than a high school education at 44.3% compared to 9.1% in Columbus.
- In Columbus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.1% compared to 8.0% in La puente.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.