Demographics details for La porte, TX vs Meadville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La porte, TX vs Meadville, PA.
Data | La porte | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Population | 36,569 | 12,680 |
Median Age | 35.9 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $79,193 | $46,157 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: La porte vs Meadville
- In La porte, the population is higher at 36,569, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- Residents in La porte have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- La porte has a higher median income of $79,193 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in La porte at 39.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- The poverty level is higher in Meadville at 12%, compared to 11% in La porte.
- The unemployment rate in La porte is higher at 5.4%, compared to 5.0% in Meadville.
Demographics
Demographics La porte vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | La porte | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 5 |
White | 35 | 86 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 39 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 6 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: La porte vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in La porte at 7% compared to 5% in Meadville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Meadville at 86% compared to 35% in La porte.
- Both La porte and Meadville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in La porte at 39% compared to 2% in Meadville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in La porte at 16% compared to 6% in Meadville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in La porte at 2% compared to 0% in Meadville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | La porte | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.0% |
Depression | 22.4% | 26.6% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 24.2% |
Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 35.1% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La porte vs Meadville
- In Meadville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in La porte.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Meadville at 26.6% versus 22.4% in La porte.
- Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 16.4% in La porte.
- Binge drinking is more common in La porte at 20.3% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 35.1% in La porte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in La porte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | La porte | Meadville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (380) | 0.2% (29) |
High School Diploma | 17.8% (6,515) | 24.5% (3,110) |
Less than High School | 14.1% (5,150) | 8.6% (1,085) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (3,911) | 15.4% (1,953) |
Education Levels Comparison: La porte vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of residents in La porte have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 17.8% in La porte.
- More residents in La porte have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 10.7% in La porte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.