Demographics details for La porte, IN vs Woodland, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La porte, IN vs Woodland, PA.
| Data | La porte | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,198 | 185 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $55,031 | $55,000 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: La porte vs Woodland
- In La porte, the population is higher at 22,198, compared to 185 in Woodland.
- The median age in Woodland is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 35.0 years in La porte.
- La porte has a higher median income of $55,031 compared to $55,000 in Woodland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in La porte at 32.0% compared to 30.0% in Woodland.
- La porte has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Woodland.
- Woodland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in La porte.
Demographics
Demographics La porte vs Woodland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | La porte | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 3 |
| White | 75 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: La porte vs Woodland
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both La porte and Woodland at 3%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodland at 92% compared to 75% in La porte.
- In Woodland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in La porte.
- The Hispanic community is larger in La porte at 13% compared to 1% in Woodland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in La porte at 8% compared to 2% in Woodland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both La porte and Woodland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | La porte | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 27.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 22.1% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La porte vs Woodland
- More residents in La porte report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- Depression is more prevalent in La porte at 27.3% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in La porte at 22.1% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- Binge drinking is more common in La porte at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- Obesity rates are higher in La porte at 36.6% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- Disability percentages are higher in La porte at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | La porte | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (173) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (4,715) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (3,566) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (2,694) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: La porte vs Woodland
- A higher percentage of residents in La porte have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- A higher percentage of residents in La porte hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- More residents in La porte have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- A higher percentage of residents in La porte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.