Demographics details for La porte, IN vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La porte, IN vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | La porte | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,198 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,031 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: La porte vs Chickasha
- In La porte, the population is higher at 22,198, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- The median age in Chickasha is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.0 years in La porte.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136, compared to $55,031 in La porte.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 32.0% in La porte.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 12% in La porte.
- The unemployment rate in La porte is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics La porte vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | La porte | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 6 |
| White | 75 | 71 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 13 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: La porte vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in La porte.
- La porte has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- The Asian population is larger in La porte at 1% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
- The Hispanic community is larger in La porte at 13% compared to 8% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 8% in La porte.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in La porte.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | La porte | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 27.3% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 22.1% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La porte vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.2% in La porte.
- Depression is more prevalent in La porte at 27.3% compared to 25.4% in Chickasha.
- Smoking is more prevalent in La porte at 22.1% compared to 21.8% in Chickasha.
- Binge drinking is more common in La porte at 16.7% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 36.6% in La porte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in La porte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | La porte | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (173) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (4,715) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (3,566) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (2,694) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: La porte vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in La porte have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 21.2% in La porte.
- More residents in La porte have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 12.1% in La porte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.