Demographics details for La mesa, CA vs Fultondale, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La mesa, CA vs Fultondale, AL.
| Data | La mesa | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,360 | 9,677 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $83,649 | $72,741 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: La mesa vs Fultondale
- In La mesa, the population is higher at 60,360, compared to 9,677 in Fultondale.
- The median age in Fultondale is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 36.3 years in La mesa.
- La mesa has a higher median income of $83,649 compared to $72,741 in Fultondale.
- In Fultondale, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in La mesa.
- La mesa has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Fultondale.
- The unemployment rate in La mesa is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Fultondale.
Demographics
Demographics La mesa vs Fultondale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | La mesa | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 35 |
| White | 42 | 51 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 28 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: La mesa vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 8% in La mesa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fultondale at 51% compared to 42% in La mesa.
- The Asian population is larger in La mesa at 7% compared to 2% in Fultondale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in La mesa at 28% compared to 9% in Fultondale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in La mesa at 15% compared to 3% in Fultondale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both La mesa and Fultondale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | La mesa | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 24.6% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La mesa vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in La mesa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fultondale at 23.9% versus 18.6% in La mesa.
- Fultondale has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 11.5% in La mesa.
- Binge drinking is more common in La mesa at 19.1% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- Fultondale has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 24.6% in La mesa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fultondale at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in La mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | La mesa | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (346) | 1.3% (121) |
| High School Diploma | 10.8% (6,496) | 17.1% (1,657) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (4,771) | 10.4% (1,005) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.9% (16,262) | 18.1% (1,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: La mesa vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in La mesa.
- In Fultondale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 10.8% in La mesa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fultondale at 10.4%, compared to 7.9% in La mesa.
- A higher percentage of residents in La mesa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 18.1% in Fultondale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.