Demographics details for La mesa, CA vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La mesa, CA vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | La mesa | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 60,360 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $83,649 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: La mesa vs Fairburn
- In La mesa, the population is higher at 60,360, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- Residents in La mesa have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- La mesa has a higher median income of $83,649 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in La mesa at 35.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 10% in La mesa.
- The unemployment rate in La mesa is higher at 4.3%, compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics La mesa vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | La mesa | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 73 |
| White | 42 | 12 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 28 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: La mesa vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 8% in La mesa.
- La mesa has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in La mesa at 7% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in La mesa at 28% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in La mesa at 15% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both La mesa and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | La mesa | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 24.6% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La mesa vs Fairburn
- More residents in La mesa report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in La mesa at 18.6% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 11.5% in La mesa.
- Binge drinking is more common in La mesa at 19.1% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 24.6% in La mesa.
- Disability percentages are higher in La mesa at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | La mesa | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (346) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 10.8% (6,496) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (4,771) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.9% (16,262) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: La mesa vs Fairburn
- A higher percentage of residents in La mesa have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 10.8% in La mesa.
- More residents in La mesa have less than a high school education at 7.9% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in La mesa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.