Demographics details for La junta, CO vs Tahoka, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La junta, CO vs Tahoka, TX.
Data | La junta | Tahoka |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,152 | 2,413 |
Median Age | 40.3 years | 37.7 years |
Median Income | $50,799 | $41,282 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: La junta vs Tahoka
- In La junta, the population is higher at 7,152, compared to 2,413 in Tahoka.
- Residents in La junta have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 37.7 years in Tahoka.
- La junta has a higher median income of $50,799 compared to $41,282 in Tahoka.
- In Tahoka, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in La junta.
- The poverty level is identical in both La junta and Tahoka at 15%.
- Tahoka has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in La junta.
Demographics
Demographics La junta vs Tahoka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | La junta | Tahoka |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 38 | 28 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 46 | 48 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 22 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: La junta vs Tahoka
- In Tahoka, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in La junta.
- La junta has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 28% in Tahoka.
- The Asian population is larger in La junta at 1% compared to 0% in Tahoka.
- Tahoka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 46% in La junta.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tahoka at 22%, compared to 11% in La junta.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in La junta at 3% compared to 0% in Tahoka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | La junta | Tahoka |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 16.3% |
Depression | 22.5% | 24.5% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 22.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 43.8% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La junta vs Tahoka
- In Tahoka, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.3% in La junta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tahoka at 24.5% versus 22.5% in La junta.
- Tahoka has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 17.9% in La junta.
- Binge drinking is more common in La junta at 17.2% compared to 15.6% in Tahoka.
- Tahoka has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 32.5% in La junta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tahoka at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in La junta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | La junta | Tahoka |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (21) | 1.5% (36) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (1,328) | 17.1% (412) |
Less than High School | 21.9% (1,569) | 28.3% (684) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (944) | 13.9% (335) |
Education Levels Comparison: La junta vs Tahoka
- In Tahoka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in La junta.
- A higher percentage of residents in La junta hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 17.1% in Tahoka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tahoka at 28.3%, compared to 21.9% in La junta.
- In Tahoka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 13.2% in La junta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.