Demographics details for La junta, CO vs Jurupa valley, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in La junta, CO vs Jurupa valley, CA.

Data La junta Jurupa valley
Population 7,152 107,609
Median Age 40.3 years 33.5 years
Median Income $50,799 $91,562
Married Families 35.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.9

Population Comparison: La junta vs Jurupa valley

  • The population in Jurupa valley is higher at 107,609, compared to 7,152 in La junta.
  • Residents in La junta have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562, compared to $50,799 in La junta.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in La junta at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
  • La junta has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Jurupa valley.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in La junta.

Demographics

Demographics La junta vs Jurupa valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic La junta Jurupa valley
Black 1 3
White 38 8
Asian 1 4
Hispanic 46 71
Two or More Races 11 13
American Indian 3 1

Demographics Comparison: La junta vs Jurupa valley

  • In Jurupa valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in La junta.
  • La junta has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
  • In Jurupa valley, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in La junta.
  • Jurupa valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 46% in La junta.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jurupa valley at 13%, compared to 11% in La junta.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in La junta at 3% compared to 1% in Jurupa valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric La junta Jurupa valley
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 13.3%
Depression 22.5% 17.4%
Smoking 17.9% 14.6%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 16.1%
Obesity 32.5% 38.4%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: La junta vs Jurupa valley

  • More residents in La junta report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in La junta at 22.5% compared to 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in La junta at 17.9% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in La junta at 17.2% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
  • Jurupa valley has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 32.5% in La junta.
  • Disability percentages are higher in La junta at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level La junta Jurupa valley
No Schooling 0.3% (21) 3.1% (3,376)
High School Diploma 18.6% (1,328) 17.3% (18,582)
Less than High School 21.9% (1,569) 34.3% (36,892)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.2% (944) 9.0% (9,706)

Education Levels Comparison: La junta vs Jurupa valley

  • In Jurupa valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.3% in La junta.
  • A higher percentage of residents in La junta hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jurupa valley at 34.3%, compared to 21.9% in La junta.
  • A higher percentage of residents in La junta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.