Demographics details for La junta, CO vs Alum creek, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La junta, CO vs Alum creek, WV.
| Data | La junta | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,152 | 1,420 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 47.4 years |
| Median Income | $50,799 | $65,179 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: La junta vs Alum creek
- In La junta, the population is higher at 7,152, compared to 1,420 in Alum creek.
- The median age in Alum creek is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 40.3 years in La junta.
- Alum creek has a higher median income of $65,179, compared to $50,799 in La junta.
- In Alum creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 35.0% in La junta.
- La junta has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Alum creek.
- Alum creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in La junta.
Demographics
Demographics La junta vs Alum creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | La junta | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 38 | 100 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 46 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: La junta vs Alum creek
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in La junta at 1% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Alum creek at 100% compared to 38% in La junta.
- The Asian population is larger in La junta at 1% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in La junta at 46% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in La junta at 11% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in La junta at 3% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | La junta | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La junta vs Alum creek
- In Alum creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.3% in La junta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alum creek at 29.5% versus 22.5% in La junta.
- Alum creek has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 17.9% in La junta.
- Binge drinking is more common in La junta at 17.2% compared to 15.1% in Alum creek.
- Alum creek has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 32.5% in La junta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alum creek at 30.0% compared to 19.0% in La junta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | La junta | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (21) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (1,328) | 34.9% (496) |
| Less than High School | 21.9% (1,569) | 8.9% (126) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (944) | 9.7% (138) |
Education Levels Comparison: La junta vs Alum creek
- A higher percentage of residents in La junta have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Alum creek.
- In Alum creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.9% compared to 18.6% in La junta.
- More residents in La junta have less than a high school education at 21.9% compared to 8.9% in Alum creek.
- A higher percentage of residents in La junta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 9.7% in Alum creek.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.