Demographics details for La crosse, WI vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in La crosse, WI vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data La crosse Massapequa park
Population 51,380 16,873
Median Age 30.0 years 43.7 years
Median Income $51,836 $161,193
Married Families 26.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: La crosse vs Massapequa park

  • In La crosse, the population is higher at 51,380, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 30.0 years in La crosse.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $51,836 in La crosse.
  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 26.0% in La crosse.
  • La crosse has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in La crosse.

Demographics

Demographics La crosse vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic La crosse Massapequa park
Black 2 1
White 88 88
Asian 4 2
Hispanic 2 5
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: La crosse vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in La crosse at 2% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both La crosse and Massapequa park at 88%.
  • The Asian population is larger in La crosse at 4% compared to 2% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in La crosse.
  • Both La crosse and Massapequa park have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both La crosse and Massapequa park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric La crosse Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 8.0%
Depression 25.7% 17.9%
Smoking 16.8% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 23.1% 19.2%
Obesity 36.9% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: La crosse vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in La crosse report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in La crosse at 25.7% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in La crosse at 16.8% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in La crosse at 23.1% compared to 19.2% in Massapequa park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in La crosse at 36.9% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in La crosse at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level La crosse Massapequa park
No Schooling 0.5% (232) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 13.6% (6,986) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 5.3% (2,721) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.8% (10,707) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: La crosse vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of residents in La crosse have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 13.6% in La crosse.
  • More residents in La crosse have less than a high school education at 5.3% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 20.8% in La crosse.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.