Demographics details for La crosse, WI vs Covington, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La crosse, WI vs Covington, WA.
Data | La crosse | Covington |
---|---|---|
Population | 51,380 | 21,374 |
Median Age | 30.0 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $51,836 | $123,065 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: La crosse vs Covington
- In La crosse, the population is higher at 51,380, compared to 21,374 in Covington.
- The median age in Covington is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 30.0 years in La crosse.
- Covington has a higher median income of $123,065, compared to $51,836 in La crosse.
- In Covington, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 26.0% in La crosse.
- La crosse has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Covington.
- Covington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.2% in La crosse.
Demographics
Demographics La crosse vs Covington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | La crosse | Covington |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 6 |
White | 88 | 63 |
Asian | 4 | 11 |
Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: La crosse vs Covington
- In Covington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in La crosse.
- La crosse has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 63% in Covington.
- In Covington, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 4% in La crosse.
- Covington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in La crosse.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Covington at 11%, compared to 4% in La crosse.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both La crosse and Covington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | La crosse | Covington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 9.6% |
Depression | 25.7% | 25.6% |
Smoking | 16.8% | 11.1% |
Binge Drinking | 23.1% | 18.7% |
Obesity | 36.9% | 25.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La crosse vs Covington
- In Covington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in La crosse.
- Depression is more prevalent in La crosse at 25.7% compared to 25.6% in Covington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in La crosse at 16.8% compared to 11.1% in Covington.
- Binge drinking is more common in La crosse at 23.1% compared to 18.7% in Covington.
- Obesity rates are higher in La crosse at 36.9% compared to 25.2% in Covington.
- Disability percentages are higher in La crosse at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Covington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | La crosse | Covington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (232) | 0.6% (130) |
High School Diploma | 13.6% (6,986) | 12.7% (2,719) |
Less than High School | 5.3% (2,721) | 6.1% (1,308) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.8% (10,707) | 22.0% (4,703) |
Education Levels Comparison: La crosse vs Covington
- In Covington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in La crosse.
- A higher percentage of residents in La crosse hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 12.7% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Covington at 6.1%, compared to 5.3% in La crosse.
- In Covington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 20.8% in La crosse.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.