Demographics details for La crescent, MN vs Max meadows, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in La crescent, MN vs Max meadows, VA.

Data La crescent Max meadows
Population 5,344 580
Median Age 42.8 years 47.2 years
Median Income $70,813 $73,683
Married Families 44.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: La crescent vs Max meadows

  • In La crescent, the population is higher at 5,344, compared to 580 in Max meadows.
  • The median age in Max meadows is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 42.8 years in La crescent.
  • Max meadows has a higher median income of $73,683, compared to $70,813 in La crescent.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in La crescent at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Max meadows.
  • La crescent has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Max meadows.
  • Max meadows has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in La crescent.

Demographics

Demographics La crescent vs Max meadows provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic La crescent Max meadows
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 92 98
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: La crescent vs Max meadows

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both La crescent and Max meadows at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Max meadows at 98% compared to 92% in La crescent.
  • Both La crescent and Max meadows have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in La crescent at 1% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in La crescent at 7% compared to 2% in Max meadows.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both La crescent and Max meadows at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric La crescent Max meadows
Mental Health Not Good 13.5% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 12.6%
Depression 22.2% 26.2%
Smoking 13.9% 20.4%
Binge Drinking 21.1% 17.9%
Obesity 33.2% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: La crescent vs Max meadows

  • In Max meadows, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 13.5% in La crescent.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Max meadows at 26.2% versus 22.2% in La crescent.
  • Max meadows has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 13.9% in La crescent.
  • Binge drinking is more common in La crescent at 21.1% compared to 17.9% in Max meadows.
  • Max meadows has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 33.2% in La crescent.
  • Disability percentages are higher in La crescent at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Max meadows.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level La crescent Max meadows
No Schooling 0.2% (10) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.2% (919) 37.1% (215)
Less than High School 6.4% (344) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.1% (1,343) 9.8% (57)

Education Levels Comparison: La crescent vs Max meadows

  • A higher percentage of residents in La crescent have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
  • In Max meadows, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.1% compared to 17.2% in La crescent.
  • More residents in La crescent have less than a high school education at 6.4% compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
  • A higher percentage of residents in La crescent hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.1% compared to 9.8% in Max meadows.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.