Demographics details for Kurtistown, HI vs Park forest, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kurtistown, HI vs Park forest, IL.
| Data | Kurtistown | Park forest |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,896 | 20,954 |
| Median Age | 49.4 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $80,625 | $58,907 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 8.9 |
Population Comparison: Kurtistown vs Park forest
- The population in Park forest is higher at 20,954, compared to 2,896 in Kurtistown.
- Residents in Kurtistown have a higher median age of 49.4 years compared to 37.4 years in Park forest.
- Kurtistown has a higher median income of $80,625 compared to $58,907 in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kurtistown at 48.0% compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- The poverty level is higher in Park forest at 13%, compared to 9% in Kurtistown.
- Park forest has a higher unemployment rate at 8.9% compared to 3.2% in Kurtistown.
Demographics
Demographics Kurtistown vs Park forest provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kurtistown | Park forest |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 72 |
| White | 28 | 17 |
| Asian | 39 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 27 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kurtistown vs Park forest
- In Park forest, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 72% compared to 0% in Kurtistown.
- Kurtistown has a higher percentage of White residents at 28% compared to 17% in Park forest.
- The Asian population is larger in Kurtistown at 39% compared to 0% in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Kurtistown.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kurtistown at 27% compared to 3% in Park forest.
- In Park forest, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kurtistown.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kurtistown | Park forest |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 16.9% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 15.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kurtistown vs Park forest
- More residents in Kurtistown report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.5% in Park forest.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Park forest at 16.9% versus 16.8% in Kurtistown.
- Park forest has a higher smoking rate at 15.9% compared to 14.9% in Kurtistown.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kurtistown at 19.0% compared to 15.8% in Park forest.
- Park forest has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 25.6% in Kurtistown.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kurtistown at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Park forest.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kurtistown | Park forest |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.9% (83) | 2.4% (503) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (541) | 13.4% (2,802) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (284) | 8.5% (1,787) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.9% (691) | 17.4% (3,650) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kurtistown vs Park forest
- A higher percentage of residents in Kurtistown have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 2.4% in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kurtistown hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- More residents in Kurtistown have less than a high school education at 9.8% compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kurtistown hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.9% compared to 17.4% in Park forest.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.