Demographics details for Kosciusko, MS vs Wheatland, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kosciusko, MS vs Wheatland, CA.
| Data | Kosciusko | Wheatland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,922 | 3,789 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $33,719 | $76,991 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Kosciusko vs Wheatland
- In Kosciusko, the population is higher at 6,922, compared to 3,789 in Wheatland.
- The median age in Wheatland is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 36.2 years in Kosciusko.
- Wheatland has a higher median income of $76,991, compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
- In Wheatland, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
- Kosciusko has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 9% in Wheatland.
- The unemployment rate in Kosciusko is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.6% in Wheatland.
Demographics
Demographics Kosciusko vs Wheatland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kosciusko | Wheatland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 53 | Data is updating |
| White | 42 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Wheatland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kosciusko at 53% compared to 0% in Wheatland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wheatland at 69% compared to 42% in Kosciusko.
- In Wheatland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Kosciusko.
- Wheatland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 2% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wheatland at 10%, compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kosciusko and Wheatland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kosciusko | Wheatland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 26.1% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.3% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 46.0% | 30.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Wheatland
- More residents in Kosciusko report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 16.4% in Wheatland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 22.8% compared to 20.5% in Wheatland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 26.1% compared to 12.7% in Wheatland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wheatland at 18.4% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kosciusko at 46.0% compared to 30.3% in Wheatland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kosciusko at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Wheatland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kosciusko | Wheatland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (39) | 1.1% (42) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (1,276) | 13.7% (518) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (624) | 10.9% (412) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (886) | 14.2% (539) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kosciusko vs Wheatland
- In Wheatland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Kosciusko.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kosciusko hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 13.7% in Wheatland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wheatland at 10.9%, compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
- In Wheatland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 12.8% in Kosciusko.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.