Environment details: Kosciusko MS
Good quality, overall safe for consumption.
Environment details: Turner OR
Moderate quality, routine assessment advisable.
Compare Environment: Kosciusko MS vs Turner OR
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Kosciusko | Turner |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 504 | 308 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Good quality, overall safe for consumption. | Moderate quality, routine assessment advisable. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.55 | 1.53 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 20 | 20 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Kosciusko vs Turner
- Water quality is rated higher in Kosciusko at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Turner.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 1.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Kosciusko with 1.55 compared to 1.53 in Turner.
- Both cities report the same number of days with poor air quality at 20.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.