Environment details: Kosciusko MS
Good quality, overall safe for consumption.
Environment details: Rogers AR
Much contamination, needs urgent attention.
Compare Environment: Kosciusko MS vs Rogers AR
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Kosciusko | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 504.415592 | 496.19974 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Good quality, overall safe for consumption. | Much contamination, needs urgent attention. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.55 | 1.62 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 20 | 12 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Kosciusko vs Rogers
- Water quality is rated higher in Kosciusko at 7/10 compared to 4/10 in Rogers.
- Rogers has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Kosciusko.
- Air quality is better in Rogers with an average index of 1.62 compared to 1.55 in Kosciusko.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Kosciusko at 20 compared to 12 in Rogers.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.