Demographics details for Kosciusko, MS vs Port huron, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kosciusko, MS vs Port huron, MI.
Data | Kosciusko | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,922 | 28,626 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 39.0 years |
Median Income | $33,719 | $47,906 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Kosciusko vs Port huron
- The population in Port huron is higher at 28,626, compared to 6,922 in Kosciusko.
- The median age in Port huron is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 36.2 years in Kosciusko.
- Port huron has a higher median income of $47,906, compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
- In Port huron, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
- Kosciusko has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 15% in Port huron.
- Port huron has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 6.5% in Kosciusko.
Demographics
Demographics Kosciusko vs Port huron provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kosciusko | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Black | 53 | 8 |
White | 42 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Port huron
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kosciusko at 53% compared to 8% in Port huron.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port huron at 76% compared to 42% in Kosciusko.
- In Port huron, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Kosciusko.
- Port huron has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port huron at 8%, compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kosciusko and Port huron at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kosciusko | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.0% |
Depression | 22.8% | 28.2% |
Smoking | 26.1% | 25.7% |
Binge Drinking | 11.3% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 46.0% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Port huron
- In Port huron, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 19.8% in Kosciusko.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port huron at 28.2% versus 22.8% in Kosciusko.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 26.1% compared to 25.7% in Port huron.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Port huron at 16.7% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kosciusko at 46.0% compared to 40.5% in Port huron.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port huron at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in Kosciusko.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kosciusko | Port huron |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (39) | 0.6% (172) |
High School Diploma | 18.4% (1,276) | 19.5% (5,596) |
Less than High School | 9.0% (624) | 13.5% (3,870) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (886) | 12.8% (3,662) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kosciusko vs Port huron
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Kosciusko and Port huron at 0.6%.
- In Port huron, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 18.4% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port huron at 13.5%, compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Kosciusko and Port huron at 12.8%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.