Demographics details for Kosciusko, MS vs Pleasureville, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kosciusko, MS vs Pleasureville, KY.

Data Kosciusko Pleasureville
Population 6,922 786
Median Age 36.2 years 27.5 years
Median Income $33,719 $47,436
Married Families 25.0% 57.0%
Poverty Level 22% 12%
Unemployment Rate 6.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Kosciusko vs Pleasureville

  • In Kosciusko, the population is higher at 6,922, compared to 786 in Pleasureville.
  • Residents in Kosciusko have a higher median age of 36.2 years compared to 27.5 years in Pleasureville.
  • Pleasureville has a higher median income of $47,436, compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
  • In Pleasureville, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
  • Kosciusko has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 12% in Pleasureville.
  • The unemployment rate in Kosciusko is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.5% in Pleasureville.

Demographics

Demographics Kosciusko vs Pleasureville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kosciusko Pleasureville
Black 53 5
White 42 86
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 3
Two or More Races 3 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Pleasureville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kosciusko at 53% compared to 5% in Pleasureville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Pleasureville at 86% compared to 42% in Kosciusko.
  • Both Kosciusko and Pleasureville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Pleasureville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Kosciusko.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pleasureville at 6%, compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kosciusko and Pleasureville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kosciusko Pleasureville
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% 19.6%
Physical Health Not Good 16.2% 14.5%
Depression 22.8% 28.2%
Smoking 26.1% 23.5%
Binge Drinking 11.3% 15.3%
Obesity 46.0% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Pleasureville

  • More residents in Kosciusko report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.6% in Pleasureville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pleasureville at 28.2% versus 22.8% in Kosciusko.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 26.1% compared to 23.5% in Pleasureville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pleasureville at 15.3% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Kosciusko at 46.0% compared to 39.5% in Pleasureville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pleasureville at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Kosciusko.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kosciusko Pleasureville
No Schooling 0.6% (39) 0.8% (6)
High School Diploma 18.4% (1,276) 54.2% (426)
Less than High School 9.0% (624) 26.1% (205)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.8% (886) 5.1% (40)

Education Levels Comparison: Kosciusko vs Pleasureville

  • In Pleasureville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Kosciusko.
  • In Pleasureville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 54.2% compared to 18.4% in Kosciusko.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pleasureville at 26.1%, compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kosciusko hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 5.1% in Pleasureville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.