Demographics details for Kosciusko, MS vs La puente, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kosciusko, MS vs La puente, CA.
Data | Kosciusko | La puente |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,922 | 36,636 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $33,719 | $77,702 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Kosciusko vs La puente
- The population in La puente is higher at 36,636, compared to 6,922 in Kosciusko.
- The median age in La puente is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 36.2 years in Kosciusko.
- La puente has a higher median income of $77,702, compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
- In La puente, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
- Kosciusko has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 12% in La puente.
- The unemployment rate in Kosciusko is higher at 6.5%, compared to 5.9% in La puente.
Demographics
Demographics Kosciusko vs La puente provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kosciusko | La puente |
---|---|---|
Black | 53 | 2 |
White | 42 | -16 |
Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
Hispanic | 2 | 84 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Kosciusko vs La puente
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kosciusko at 53% compared to 2% in La puente.
- Kosciusko has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to -16% in La puente.
- In La puente, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Kosciusko.
- La puente has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 2% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in La puente at 13%, compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
- In La puente, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Kosciusko.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kosciusko | La puente |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 13.4% |
Depression | 22.8% | 15.3% |
Smoking | 26.1% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 11.3% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 46.0% | 31.6% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kosciusko vs La puente
- More residents in Kosciusko report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.8% in La puente.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 22.8% compared to 15.3% in La puente.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 26.1% compared to 11.8% in La puente.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in La puente at 14.5% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kosciusko at 46.0% compared to 31.6% in La puente.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kosciusko at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in La puente.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kosciusko | La puente |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (39) | 5.0% (1,841) |
High School Diploma | 18.4% (1,276) | 18.6% (6,830) |
Less than High School | 9.0% (624) | 44.3% (16,244) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (886) | 8.0% (2,926) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kosciusko vs La puente
- In La puente, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 0.6% in Kosciusko.
- In La puente, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 18.4% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in La puente at 44.3%, compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kosciusko hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 8.0% in La puente.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.