Demographics details for Kosciusko, MS vs Green bay, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kosciusko, MS vs Green bay, WI.
Data | Kosciusko | Green bay |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,922 | 106,095 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 35.6 years |
Median Income | $33,719 | $59,174 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Kosciusko vs Green bay
- The population in Green bay is higher at 106,095, compared to 6,922 in Kosciusko.
- Residents in Kosciusko have a higher median age of 36.2 years compared to 35.6 years in Green bay.
- Green bay has a higher median income of $59,174, compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
- In Green bay, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
- Kosciusko has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 10% in Green bay.
- The unemployment rate in Kosciusko is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.2% in Green bay.
Demographics
Demographics Kosciusko vs Green bay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kosciusko | Green bay |
---|---|---|
Black | 53 | 4 |
White | 42 | 61 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 2 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Green bay
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kosciusko at 53% compared to 4% in Green bay.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Green bay at 61% compared to 42% in Kosciusko.
- In Green bay, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Kosciusko.
- Green bay has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 2% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Green bay at 11%, compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
- In Green bay, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Kosciusko.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kosciusko | Green bay |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 11.0% |
Depression | 22.8% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 26.1% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 11.3% | 22.8% |
Obesity | 46.0% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Green bay
- More residents in Kosciusko report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.3% in Green bay.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 22.8% compared to 22.1% in Green bay.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 26.1% compared to 16.8% in Green bay.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Green bay at 22.8% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kosciusko at 46.0% compared to 38.0% in Green bay.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kosciusko at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Green bay.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kosciusko | Green bay |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (39) | 1.7% (1,796) |
High School Diploma | 18.4% (1,276) | 18.1% (19,183) |
Less than High School | 9.0% (624) | 14.0% (14,805) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (886) | 16.6% (17,606) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kosciusko vs Green bay
- In Green bay, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Kosciusko.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kosciusko hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 18.1% in Green bay.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Green bay at 14.0%, compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
- In Green bay, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 12.8% in Kosciusko.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.