Demographics details for Kosciusko, MS vs Fall river mills, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kosciusko, MS vs Fall river mills, CA.

Data Kosciusko Fall river mills
Population 6,922 678
Median Age 36.2 years 27.7 years
Median Income $33,719 $36,827
Married Families 25.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 22% 15%
Unemployment Rate 6.5 6.0

Population Comparison: Kosciusko vs Fall river mills

  • In Kosciusko, the population is higher at 6,922, compared to 678 in Fall river mills.
  • Residents in Kosciusko have a higher median age of 36.2 years compared to 27.7 years in Fall river mills.
  • Fall river mills has a higher median income of $36,827, compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
  • In Fall river mills, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
  • Kosciusko has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 15% in Fall river mills.
  • The unemployment rate in Kosciusko is higher at 6.5%, compared to 6.0% in Fall river mills.

Demographics

Demographics Kosciusko vs Fall river mills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kosciusko Fall river mills
Black 53 1
White 42 36
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 25
Two or More Races 3 27
American Indian Data is updating 11

Demographics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Fall river mills

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kosciusko at 53% compared to 1% in Fall river mills.
  • Kosciusko has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 36% in Fall river mills.
  • Both Kosciusko and Fall river mills have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Fall river mills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 2% in Kosciusko.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fall river mills at 27%, compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
  • In Fall river mills, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 0% in Kosciusko.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kosciusko Fall river mills
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 16.2% 11.7%
Depression 22.8% 21.7%
Smoking 26.1% 14.7%
Binge Drinking 11.3% 18.0%
Obesity 46.0% 31.3%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Fall river mills

  • More residents in Kosciusko report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.9% in Fall river mills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 22.8% compared to 21.7% in Fall river mills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 26.1% compared to 14.7% in Fall river mills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fall river mills at 18.0% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Kosciusko at 46.0% compared to 31.3% in Fall river mills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Kosciusko at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Fall river mills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kosciusko Fall river mills
No Schooling 0.6% (39) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 18.4% (1,276) 13.4% (91)
Less than High School 9.0% (624) 9.7% (66)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.8% (886) 4.9% (33)

Education Levels Comparison: Kosciusko vs Fall river mills

  • A higher percentage of residents in Kosciusko have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Fall river mills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kosciusko hold a high school diploma at 18.4% compared to 13.4% in Fall river mills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fall river mills at 9.7%, compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kosciusko hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 4.9% in Fall river mills.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.