Demographics details for Klamath falls, OR vs Wyandotte, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Klamath falls, OR vs Wyandotte, MI.

Data Klamath falls Wyandotte
Population 21,977 24,503
Median Age 35.1 years 39.6 years
Median Income $46,695 $62,111
Married Families 31.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 18% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.2

Population Comparison: Klamath falls vs Wyandotte

  • The population in Wyandotte is higher at 24,503, compared to 21,977 in Klamath falls.
  • The median age in Wyandotte is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
  • Wyandotte has a higher median income of $62,111, compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
  • In Wyandotte, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
  • Klamath falls has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Wyandotte.
  • The unemployment rate in Klamath falls is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Wyandotte.

Demographics

Demographics Klamath falls vs Wyandotte provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Klamath falls Wyandotte
Black 1 2
White 69 85
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 15 7
Two or More Races 11 5
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Wyandotte

  • In Wyandotte, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Wyandotte at 85% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
  • Both Klamath falls and Wyandotte have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Klamath falls at 15% compared to 7% in Wyandotte.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Klamath falls at 11% compared to 5% in Wyandotte.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Klamath falls at 3% compared to 0% in Wyandotte.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Klamath falls Wyandotte
Mental Health Not Good 20.2% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.4% 11.5%
Depression 28.4% 25.3%
Smoking 19.9% 20.8%
Binge Drinking 15.8% 19.5%
Obesity 35.9% 32.1%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Wyandotte

  • More residents in Klamath falls report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.6% in Wyandotte.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 28.4% compared to 25.3% in Wyandotte.
  • Wyandotte has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 19.9% in Klamath falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wyandotte at 19.5% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Klamath falls at 35.9% compared to 32.1% in Wyandotte.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Wyandotte.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Klamath falls Wyandotte
No Schooling 0.9% (192) 1.1% (280)
High School Diploma 16.0% (3,508) 21.6% (5,291)
Less than High School 15.5% (3,401) 12.0% (2,952)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (3,175) 16.2% (3,980)

Education Levels Comparison: Klamath falls vs Wyandotte

  • In Wyandotte, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
  • In Wyandotte, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
  • More residents in Klamath falls have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 12.0% in Wyandotte.
  • In Wyandotte, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.