Demographics details for Klamath falls, OR vs Williamston, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Klamath falls, OR vs Williamston, NC.
Data | Klamath falls | Williamston |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,977 | 5,095 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 45.5 years |
Median Income | $46,695 | $41,182 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Klamath falls vs Williamston
- In Klamath falls, the population is higher at 21,977, compared to 5,095 in Williamston.
- The median age in Williamston is higher at 45.5 years, compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher median income of $46,695 compared to $41,182 in Williamston.
- In Williamston, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Williamston at 19%, compared to 18% in Klamath falls.
- Williamston has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 5.2% in Klamath falls.
Demographics
Demographics Klamath falls vs Williamston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Klamath falls | Williamston |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 54 |
White | 69 | 25 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 15 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 10 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Williamston
- In Williamston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 54% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 25% in Williamston.
- In Williamston, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Klamath falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Klamath falls at 15% compared to 9% in Williamston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Klamath falls at 11% compared to 10% in Williamston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Klamath falls at 3% compared to 0% in Williamston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Klamath falls | Williamston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 17.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 12.9% |
Depression | 28.4% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 19.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 35.9% | 41.3% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Williamston
- More residents in Klamath falls report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.7% in Williamston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 28.4% compared to 22.0% in Williamston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 19.9% compared to 19.7% in Williamston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Klamath falls at 15.8% compared to 14.1% in Williamston.
- Williamston has higher obesity rates at 41.3% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Klamath falls and Williamston at 20.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Klamath falls | Williamston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (192) | 4.9% (251) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (3,508) | 16.0% (816) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (3,401) | 24.8% (1,266) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (3,175) | 12.9% (656) |
Education Levels Comparison: Klamath falls vs Williamston
- In Williamston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.9% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 16.0%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Williamston at 24.8%, compared to 15.5% in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Klamath falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 12.9% in Williamston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.