Demographics details for Klamath falls, OR vs Upper darby, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Klamath falls, OR vs Upper darby, PA.

Data Klamath falls Upper darby
Population 21,977 85,217
Median Age 35.1 years 35.7 years
Median Income $46,695 $67,579
Married Families 31.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 18% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Klamath falls vs Upper darby

  • The population in Upper darby is higher at 85,217, compared to 21,977 in Klamath falls.
  • The median age in Upper darby is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
  • Upper darby has a higher median income of $67,579, compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
  • In Upper darby, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
  • Klamath falls has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Upper darby.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Klamath falls and Upper darby at 5.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Klamath falls vs Upper darby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Klamath falls Upper darby
Black 1 34
White 69 39
Asian 1 12
Hispanic 15 9
Two or More Races 11 6
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Upper darby

  • In Upper darby, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
  • Klamath falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 39% in Upper darby.
  • In Upper darby, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Klamath falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Klamath falls at 15% compared to 9% in Upper darby.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Klamath falls at 11% compared to 6% in Upper darby.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Klamath falls at 3% compared to 0% in Upper darby.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Klamath falls Upper darby
Mental Health Not Good 20.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.4% Data is updating%
Depression 28.4% Data is updating%
Smoking 19.9% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.8% Data is updating%
Obesity 35.9% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Upper darby

  • More residents in Klamath falls report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 28.4% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Klamath falls at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Klamath falls at 35.9% compared to 0.0% in Upper darby.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Upper darby.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Klamath falls Upper darby
No Schooling 0.9% (192) 1.4% (1,162)
High School Diploma 16.0% (3,508) 17.6% (14,973)
Less than High School 15.5% (3,401) 10.3% (8,806)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (3,175) 22.2% (18,927)

Education Levels Comparison: Klamath falls vs Upper darby

  • In Upper darby, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
  • In Upper darby, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
  • More residents in Klamath falls have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 10.3% in Upper darby.
  • In Upper darby, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.