Demographics details for Klamath falls, OR vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Klamath falls, OR vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Klamath falls | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,977 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $46,695 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Klamath falls vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 21,977 in Klamath falls.
- The median age in Tacoma is higher at 36.9 years, compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085, compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The unemployment rate in Klamath falls is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.9% in Tacoma.
Demographics
Demographics Klamath falls vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Klamath falls | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 11 |
| White | 69 | 53 |
| Asian | 1 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 13 |
| American Indian | 3 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Klamath falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Klamath falls at 15% compared to 12% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 11% in Klamath falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Klamath falls at 3% compared to 2% in Tacoma.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Klamath falls | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Tacoma
- More residents in Klamath falls report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.9% in Tacoma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 28.4% compared to 26.2% in Tacoma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 19.9% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Klamath falls at 35.9% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- Disability percentages are higher in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Tacoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Klamath falls | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (192) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (3,508) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (3,401) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (3,175) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Klamath falls vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Klamath falls hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- More residents in Klamath falls have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.