Demographics details for Klamath falls, OR vs Portsmouth, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Klamath falls, OR vs Portsmouth, VA.

Data Klamath falls Portsmouth
Population 21,977 97,029
Median Age 35.1 years 35.6 years
Median Income $46,695 $57,154
Married Families 31.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 18% 15%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.6

Population Comparison: Klamath falls vs Portsmouth

  • The population in Portsmouth is higher at 97,029, compared to 21,977 in Klamath falls.
  • The median age in Portsmouth is higher at 35.6 years, compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
  • Portsmouth has a higher median income of $57,154, compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Klamath falls at 31.0% compared to 30.0% in Portsmouth.
  • Klamath falls has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 15% in Portsmouth.
  • The unemployment rate in Klamath falls is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.6% in Portsmouth.

Demographics

Demographics Klamath falls vs Portsmouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Klamath falls Portsmouth
Black 1 52
White 69 35
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 15 5
Two or More Races 11 7
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Portsmouth

  • In Portsmouth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
  • Klamath falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 35% in Portsmouth.
  • Both Klamath falls and Portsmouth have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Klamath falls at 15% compared to 5% in Portsmouth.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Klamath falls at 11% compared to 7% in Portsmouth.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Klamath falls at 3% compared to 0% in Portsmouth.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Klamath falls Portsmouth
Mental Health Not Good 20.2% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.4% 12.1%
Depression 28.4% 21.0%
Smoking 19.9% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 15.8% 15.0%
Obesity 35.9% 47.1%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Portsmouth

  • More residents in Klamath falls report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.1% in Portsmouth.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 28.4% compared to 21.0% in Portsmouth.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 19.9% compared to 18.5% in Portsmouth.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Klamath falls at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Portsmouth.
  • Portsmouth has higher obesity rates at 47.1% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Portsmouth.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Klamath falls Portsmouth
No Schooling 0.9% (192) 0.8% (737)
High School Diploma 16.0% (3,508) 17.5% (17,012)
Less than High School 15.5% (3,401) 9.6% (9,309)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (3,175) 14.4% (13,933)

Education Levels Comparison: Klamath falls vs Portsmouth

  • A higher percentage of residents in Klamath falls have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Portsmouth.
  • In Portsmouth, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
  • More residents in Klamath falls have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 9.6% in Portsmouth.
  • The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Klamath falls and Portsmouth at 14.4%.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.