Demographics details for Klamath falls, OR vs Latah, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Klamath falls, OR vs Latah, WA.
| Data | Klamath falls | Latah |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,977 | 176 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $46,695 | $46,563 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Klamath falls vs Latah
- In Klamath falls, the population is higher at 21,977, compared to 176 in Latah.
- The median age in Latah is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher median income of $46,695 compared to $46,563 in Latah.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Klamath falls at 31.0% compared to 23.0% in Latah.
- Klamath falls has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 0% in Latah.
- The unemployment rate in Klamath falls is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Latah.
Demographics
Demographics Klamath falls vs Latah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Klamath falls | Latah |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 69 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Latah
- In Latah, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Latah at 89% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
- The Asian population is larger in Klamath falls at 1% compared to 0% in Latah.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Klamath falls at 15% compared to 4% in Latah.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Klamath falls at 11% compared to 5% in Latah.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Klamath falls at 3% compared to 0% in Latah.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Klamath falls | Latah |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 38.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Latah
- More residents in Klamath falls report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.9% in Latah.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Latah at 29.5% versus 28.4% in Klamath falls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 19.9% compared to 15.3% in Latah.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Latah at 18.0% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Klamath falls at 35.9% compared to 30.2% in Latah.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Latah at 38.0% compared to 20.0% in Klamath falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Klamath falls | Latah |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (192) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (3,508) | 26.7% (47) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (3,401) | 0.6% (1) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (3,175) | 11.9% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Klamath falls vs Latah
- A higher percentage of residents in Klamath falls have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Latah.
- In Latah, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.7% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
- More residents in Klamath falls have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 0.6% in Latah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Klamath falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 11.9% in Latah.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.