Demographics details for Klamath falls, OR vs Center, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Klamath falls, OR vs Center, TX.
Data | Klamath falls | Center |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,977 | 5,147 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 38.2 years |
Median Income | $46,695 | $57,875 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Klamath falls vs Center
- In Klamath falls, the population is higher at 21,977, compared to 5,147 in Center.
- The median age in Center is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
- Center has a higher median income of $57,875, compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
- In Center, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 14% in Center.
- The unemployment rate in Klamath falls is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.5% in Center.
Demographics
Demographics Klamath falls vs Center provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Klamath falls | Center |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 26 |
White | 69 | 44 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Center
- In Center, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 26% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 44% in Center.
- The Asian population is larger in Klamath falls at 1% compared to 0% in Center.
- Center has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 15% in Klamath falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Klamath falls at 11% compared to 3% in Center.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Klamath falls at 3% compared to 0% in Center.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Klamath falls | Center |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 21.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 16.7% |
Depression | 28.4% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 35.9% | 44.2% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Center
- In Center, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 20.2% in Klamath falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 28.4% compared to 24.3% in Center.
- Center has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 19.9% in Klamath falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Klamath falls at 15.8% compared to 14.6% in Center.
- Center has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Center.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Klamath falls | Center |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (192) | 1.6% (81) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (3,508) | 24.8% (1,277) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (3,401) | 26.6% (1,369) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (3,175) | 8.0% (414) |
Education Levels Comparison: Klamath falls vs Center
- In Center, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
- In Center, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Center at 26.6%, compared to 15.5% in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Klamath falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 8.0% in Center.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.