Demographics details for Klamath falls, OR vs Burbank, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Klamath falls, OR vs Burbank, CA.
Data | Klamath falls | Burbank |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,977 | 103,920 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 39.6 years |
Median Income | $46,695 | $91,455 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Klamath falls vs Burbank
- The population in Burbank is higher at 103,920, compared to 21,977 in Klamath falls.
- The median age in Burbank is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
- Burbank has a higher median income of $91,455, compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
- In Burbank, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 11% in Burbank.
- Burbank has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 5.2% in Klamath falls.
Demographics
Demographics Klamath falls vs Burbank provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Klamath falls | Burbank |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 69 | 46 |
Asian | 1 | 12 |
Hispanic | 15 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 13 |
American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Burbank
- In Burbank, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 46% in Burbank.
- In Burbank, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Klamath falls.
- Burbank has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 15% in Klamath falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Burbank at 13%, compared to 11% in Klamath falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Klamath falls at 3% compared to 1% in Burbank.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Klamath falls | Burbank |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 9.7% |
Depression | 28.4% | 16.9% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 9.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 35.9% | 26.0% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Burbank
- More residents in Klamath falls report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 14.8% in Burbank.
- Depression is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 28.4% compared to 16.9% in Burbank.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 19.9% compared to 9.8% in Burbank.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burbank at 16.6% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Klamath falls at 35.9% compared to 26.0% in Burbank.
- Disability percentages are higher in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Burbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Klamath falls | Burbank |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (192) | 1.1% (1,105) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (3,508) | 10.3% (10,721) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (3,401) | 10.0% (10,407) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (3,175) | 33.8% (35,079) |
Education Levels Comparison: Klamath falls vs Burbank
- In Burbank, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Klamath falls hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 10.3% in Burbank.
- More residents in Klamath falls have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 10.0% in Burbank.
- In Burbank, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.8% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.