Environment details: Klamath falls OR
water quality is acceptable; few contaminants present.
Environment details: Big sky MT
Water quality acceptable, minimal pollution detected.
Compare Environment: Klamath falls OR vs Big sky MT
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Klamath falls | Big sky |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 308 | 228 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is acceptable; few contaminants present. | Water quality acceptable, minimal pollution detected. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.59 | 1.69 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 24 | 17 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Klamath falls vs Big sky
- Both cities report the same water quality at 6/10.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Big sky with an average index of 1.69 compared to 1.59 in Klamath falls.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Klamath falls at 24 compared to 17 in Big sky.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.