Demographics details for Kissimmee, FL vs Meadville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kissimmee, FL vs Meadville, PA.
| Data | Kissimmee | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 80,003 | 12,680 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $45,319 | $46,157 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Kissimmee vs Meadville
- In Kissimmee, the population is higher at 80,003, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- The median age is the same in both Kissimmee and Meadville at 35.7 years.
- Meadville has a higher median income of $46,157, compared to $45,319 in Kissimmee.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kissimmee at 31.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- Kissimmee has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.8% in Kissimmee.
Demographics
Demographics Kissimmee vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kissimmee | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 5 |
| White | Data is updating | 86 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 69 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kissimmee vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kissimmee at 10% compared to 5% in Meadville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Meadville at 86% compared to 0% in Kissimmee.
- The Asian population is larger in Kissimmee at 3% compared to 1% in Meadville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kissimmee at 69% compared to 2% in Meadville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kissimmee at 18% compared to 6% in Meadville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kissimmee and Meadville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kissimmee | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kissimmee vs Meadville
- In Meadville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.3% in Kissimmee.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Meadville at 26.6% versus 18.5% in Kissimmee.
- Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 19.9% in Kissimmee.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Meadville at 16.6% compared to 14.2% in Kissimmee.
- Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 37.7% in Kissimmee.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Kissimmee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kissimmee | Meadville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (1,327) | 0.2% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (13,387) | 24.5% (3,110) |
| Less than High School | 19.4% (15,558) | 8.6% (1,085) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (12,446) | 15.4% (1,953) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kissimmee vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of residents in Kissimmee have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 16.7% in Kissimmee.
- More residents in Kissimmee have less than a high school education at 19.4% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kissimmee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.