Demographics details for Kissimmee, FL vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kissimmee, FL vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Kissimmee | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 80,003 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $45,319 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Kissimmee vs Coalinga
- In Kissimmee, the population is higher at 80,003, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Kissimmee have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $45,319 in Kissimmee.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Kissimmee and Coalinga at 31.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 13% in Kissimmee.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.8% in Kissimmee.
Demographics
Demographics Kissimmee vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kissimmee | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 4 |
| White | Data is updating | 9 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 69 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Kissimmee vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kissimmee at 10% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Coalinga at 9% compared to 0% in Kissimmee.
- The Asian population is larger in Kissimmee at 3% compared to 2% in Coalinga.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kissimmee at 69% compared to 65% in Coalinga.
- Both Kissimmee and Coalinga have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 18%.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Kissimmee.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kissimmee | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kissimmee vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.3% in Kissimmee.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kissimmee at 18.5% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kissimmee at 19.9% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 14.2% in Kissimmee.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 37.7% in Kissimmee.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kissimmee at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kissimmee | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (1,327) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 16.7% (13,387) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 19.4% (15,558) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (12,446) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kissimmee vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.7% in Kissimmee.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kissimmee hold a high school diploma at 16.7% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 19.4% in Kissimmee.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kissimmee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.