Demographics details for Kissimmee, FL vs Averill park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kissimmee, FL vs Averill park, NY.

Data Kissimmee Averill park
Population 80,003 1,608
Median Age 35.7 years 53.3 years
Median Income $45,319 $109,746
Married Families 31.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 13% 4%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Kissimmee vs Averill park

  • In Kissimmee, the population is higher at 80,003, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 35.7 years in Kissimmee.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746, compared to $45,319 in Kissimmee.
  • In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 31.0% in Kissimmee.
  • Kissimmee has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • The unemployment rate in Kissimmee is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Averill park.

Demographics

Demographics Kissimmee vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kissimmee Averill park
Black 10 Data is updating
White Data is updating 100
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 69 Data is updating
Two or More Races 18 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Kissimmee vs Averill park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kissimmee at 10% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to 0% in Kissimmee.
  • The Asian population is larger in Kissimmee at 3% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Kissimmee at 69% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Kissimmee at 18% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kissimmee and Averill park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kissimmee Averill park
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.7% 9.1%
Depression 18.5% 23.7%
Smoking 19.9% 15.9%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 21.5%
Obesity 37.7% 34.6%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kissimmee vs Averill park

  • More residents in Kissimmee report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Averill park at 23.7% versus 18.5% in Kissimmee.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Kissimmee at 19.9% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 14.2% in Kissimmee.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Kissimmee at 37.7% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Kissimmee at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Averill park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kissimmee Averill park
No Schooling 1.7% (1,327) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.7% (13,387) 22.0% (354)
Less than High School 19.4% (15,558) 3.7% (60)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.6% (12,446) 32.3% (520)

Education Levels Comparison: Kissimmee vs Averill park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Kissimmee have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 16.7% in Kissimmee.
  • More residents in Kissimmee have less than a high school education at 19.4% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 15.6% in Kissimmee.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.