Environment details: Kirkland WA
water quality is good with few issues.
Environment details: Smithville MO
Very poor; high contamination levels.
Compare Environment: Kirkland WA vs Smithville MO
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Kirkland | Smithville |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 590 | 936 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 2/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is good with few issues. | Very poor; high contamination levels. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.6 | 1.73 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 26 | 38 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Kirkland vs Smithville
- Water quality is rated higher in Kirkland at 7/10 compared to 2/10 in Smithville.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Smithville with an average index of 1.73 compared to 1.6 in Kirkland.
- Smithville experiences more days with poor air quality at 38 compared to 26 in Kirkland.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.