Demographics details for Kirkland, IL vs Cody, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kirkland, IL vs Cody, NE.
| Data | Kirkland | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,631 | 167 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $86,950 | $48,750 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Kirkland vs Cody
- In Kirkland, the population is higher at 1,631, compared to 167 in Cody.
- The median age in Cody is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 34.8 years in Kirkland.
- Kirkland has a higher median income of $86,950 compared to $48,750 in Cody.
- In Cody, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 36.0% in Kirkland.
- The poverty level is higher in Cody at 12%, compared to 0% in Kirkland.
- The unemployment rate in Kirkland is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Cody.
Demographics
Demographics Kirkland vs Cody provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kirkland | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Kirkland vs Cody
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Kirkland and Cody at 0%.
- Kirkland has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 88% in Cody.
- Both Kirkland and Cody have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kirkland at 6% compared to 0% in Cody.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cody at 7%, compared to 5% in Kirkland.
- In Cody, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Kirkland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kirkland | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kirkland vs Cody
- More residents in Kirkland report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 14.4% in Cody.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kirkland at 21.8% compared to 17.6% in Cody.
- Cody has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 16.3% in Kirkland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cody at 20.4% compared to 18.8% in Kirkland.
- Cody has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 36.2% in Kirkland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cody at 25.0% compared to 12.0% in Kirkland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kirkland | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 1.2% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (204) | 28.1% (47) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (186) | 10.8% (18) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.4% (203) | 17.4% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kirkland vs Cody
- In Cody, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Kirkland.
- In Cody, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 12.5% in Kirkland.
- More residents in Kirkland have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 10.8% in Cody.
- In Cody, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 12.4% in Kirkland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.