Demographics details for Kirkland, IL vs Clayton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kirkland, IL vs Clayton, OH.
| Data | Kirkland | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,631 | 13,235 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $86,950 | $89,282 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kirkland vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 13,235, compared to 1,631 in Kirkland.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 34.8 years in Kirkland.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282, compared to $86,950 in Kirkland.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 36.0% in Kirkland.
- The poverty level is higher in Clayton at 10%, compared to 0% in Kirkland.
- The unemployment rate in Kirkland is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Kirkland vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kirkland | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 30 |
| White | 89 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kirkland vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 0% in Kirkland.
- Kirkland has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Kirkland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kirkland at 6% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- Both Kirkland and Clayton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kirkland and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kirkland | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kirkland vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.1% in Kirkland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 24.4% versus 21.8% in Kirkland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kirkland at 16.3% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 18.8% in Kirkland.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 36.2% in Kirkland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Kirkland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kirkland | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (204) | 17.9% (2,371) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (186) | 5.6% (746) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.4% (203) | 26.3% (3,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kirkland vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Kirkland have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 12.5% in Kirkland.
- More residents in Kirkland have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 12.4% in Kirkland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.