Demographics details for Kirkersville, OH vs Richland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kirkersville, OH vs Richland, MS.
Data | Kirkersville | Richland |
---|---|---|
Population | 474 | 7,297 |
Median Age | 53.3 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $76,563 | $54,753 |
Married Families | 57.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Kirkersville vs Richland
- The population in Richland is higher at 7,297, compared to 474 in Kirkersville.
- Residents in Kirkersville have a higher median age of 53.3 years compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Kirkersville has a higher median income of $76,563 compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kirkersville at 57.0% compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- The poverty level is higher in Richland at 12%, compared to 5% in Kirkersville.
- Richland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Kirkersville.
Demographics
Demographics Kirkersville vs Richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kirkersville | Richland |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 19 |
White | 93 | 74 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kirkersville vs Richland
- In Richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 2% in Kirkersville.
- Kirkersville has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 74% in Richland.
- In Richland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Kirkersville.
- Richland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Kirkersville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kirkersville at 4% compared to 2% in Richland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kirkersville and Richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kirkersville | Richland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 11.7% |
Depression | 22.8% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 19.3% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 14.2% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 37.4% |
Disability Percentage | 37.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kirkersville vs Richland
- In Richland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.5% in Kirkersville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richland at 23.4% versus 22.8% in Kirkersville.
- Richland has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 15.4% in Kirkersville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kirkersville at 19.2% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Richland has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 36.1% in Kirkersville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kirkersville at 37.0% compared to 13.0% in Richland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kirkersville | Richland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.7% (122) |
High School Diploma | 38.6% (183) | 12.6% (916) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (61) | 10.0% (732) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (29) | 16.1% (1,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kirkersville vs Richland
- In Richland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Kirkersville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kirkersville hold a high school diploma at 38.6% compared to 12.6% in Richland.
- More residents in Kirkersville have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 10.0% in Richland.
- In Richland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 6.1% in Kirkersville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.