Environment details: Kingston TN
acceptable; some quality issues remain.
Environment details: Fulton MO
water quality is acceptable, minimal concerns.
Compare Environment: Kingston TN vs Fulton MO
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Kingston | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 741 | 936 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | acceptable; some quality issues remain. | water quality is acceptable, minimal concerns. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.6 | 1.59 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 30 | 17 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Kingston vs Fulton
- Both cities report the same water quality at 6/10.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Kingston with 1.6 compared to 1.59 in Fulton.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Kingston at 30 compared to 17 in Fulton.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.