Demographics details for Kingston, RI vs Griffin, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingston, RI vs Griffin, GA.
| Data | Kingston | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,560 | 23,693 |
| Median Age | 19.6 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $108,056 | $42,047 |
| Married Families | 13.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Kingston vs Griffin
- The population in Griffin is higher at 23,693, compared to 6,560 in Kingston.
- The median age in Griffin is higher at 33.2 years, compared to 19.6 years in Kingston.
- Kingston has a higher median income of $108,056 compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- In Griffin, the percentage of married families is higher at 26.0%, compared to 13.0% in Kingston.
- The poverty level is higher in Griffin at 15%, compared to 11% in Kingston.
- Griffin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.6% in Kingston.
Demographics
Demographics Kingston vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingston | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 52 |
| White | 80 | 36 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kingston vs Griffin
- In Griffin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 5% in Kingston.
- Kingston has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- The Asian population is larger in Kingston at 2% compared to 1% in Griffin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kingston at 6% compared to 5% in Griffin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingston at 6% compared to 5% in Griffin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingston and Griffin at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingston | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 11.4% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 25.9% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingston vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 14.9% in Kingston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingston at 24.9% compared to 19.7% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 11.4% in Kingston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingston at 19.1% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Griffin has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 25.9% in Kingston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Griffin at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Kingston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingston | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (3) | 2.2% (517) |
| High School Diploma | 1.1% (71) | 22.6% (5,347) |
| Less than High School | 0.1% (6) | 16.3% (3,859) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (839) | 11.9% (2,819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingston vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Kingston.
- In Griffin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 1.1% in Kingston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Griffin at 16.3%, compared to 0.1% in Kingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.