Demographics details for Kingston, RI vs Blackfoot, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingston, RI vs Blackfoot, ID.
| Data | Kingston | Blackfoot |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,560 | 12,702 |
| Median Age | 19.6 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $108,056 | $57,951 |
| Married Families | 13.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kingston vs Blackfoot
- The population in Blackfoot is higher at 12,702, compared to 6,560 in Kingston.
- The median age in Blackfoot is higher at 34.4 years, compared to 19.6 years in Kingston.
- Kingston has a higher median income of $108,056 compared to $57,951 in Blackfoot.
- In Blackfoot, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 13.0% in Kingston.
- The poverty level is higher in Blackfoot at 13%, compared to 11% in Kingston.
- Blackfoot has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.6% in Kingston.
Demographics
Demographics Kingston vs Blackfoot provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingston | Blackfoot |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 80 | 71 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Kingston vs Blackfoot
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingston at 5% compared to 0% in Blackfoot.
- Kingston has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 71% in Blackfoot.
- The Asian population is larger in Kingston at 2% compared to 0% in Blackfoot.
- Blackfoot has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 6% in Kingston.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Blackfoot at 7%, compared to 6% in Kingston.
- In Blackfoot, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Kingston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingston | Blackfoot |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 11.4% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 25.9% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingston vs Blackfoot
- In Blackfoot, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 14.9% in Kingston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingston at 24.9% compared to 24.0% in Blackfoot.
- Blackfoot has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 11.4% in Kingston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingston at 19.1% compared to 14.3% in Blackfoot.
- Blackfoot has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 25.9% in Kingston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Blackfoot at 17.0% compared to 6.0% in Kingston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingston | Blackfoot |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (3) | 0.1% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 1.1% (71) | 15.5% (1,974) |
| Less than High School | 0.1% (6) | 13.2% (1,678) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (839) | 13.6% (1,726) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingston vs Blackfoot
- In Blackfoot, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Kingston.
- In Blackfoot, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 1.1% in Kingston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Blackfoot at 13.2%, compared to 0.1% in Kingston.
- In Blackfoot, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 12.8% in Kingston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.