Demographics details for Kingston, GA vs South haven, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingston, GA vs South haven, MI.
| Data | Kingston | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 742 | 3,988 |
| Median Age | 43.3 years | 61.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $63,202 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kingston vs South haven
- The population in South haven is higher at 3,988, compared to 742 in Kingston.
- The median age in South haven is higher at 61.0 years, compared to 43.3 years in Kingston.
- South haven has a higher median income of $63,202, compared to $50,000 in Kingston.
- In South haven, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 29.0% in Kingston.
- The poverty level is higher in South haven at 12%, compared to 8% in Kingston.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Kingston and South haven at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Kingston vs South haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingston | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 11 |
| White | 53 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kingston vs South haven
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingston at 30% compared to 11% in South haven.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South haven at 74% compared to 53% in Kingston.
- In South haven, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Kingston.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Kingston and South haven at 6%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingston at 11% compared to 7% in South haven.
- In South haven, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kingston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingston | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 35.1% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingston vs South haven
- More residents in Kingston report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South haven at 24.3% versus 22.2% in Kingston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingston at 18.2% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South haven at 18.0% compared to 16.1% in Kingston.
- South haven has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 35.1% in Kingston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingston at 25.0% compared to 18.0% in South haven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingston | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (14) | 1.2% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 19.1% (142) | 16.0% (638) |
| Less than High School | 26.8% (199) | 11.5% (457) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.1% (23) | 32.1% (1,279) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingston vs South haven
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingston have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.2% in South haven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingston hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 16.0% in South haven.
- More residents in Kingston have less than a high school education at 26.8% compared to 11.5% in South haven.
- In South haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 3.1% in Kingston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.