Demographics details for Kingsport, TN vs Pahrump, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingsport, TN vs Pahrump, NV.
| Data | Kingsport | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,150 | 44,711 |
| Median Age | 44.6 years | 53.7 years |
| Median Income | $48,228 | $54,988 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Kingsport vs Pahrump
- In Kingsport, the population is higher at 56,150, compared to 44,711 in Pahrump.
- The median age in Pahrump is higher at 53.7 years, compared to 44.6 years in Kingsport.
- Pahrump has a higher median income of $54,988, compared to $48,228 in Kingsport.
- In Pahrump, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Kingsport.
- Kingsport has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Pahrump.
- Pahrump has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.2% in Kingsport.
Demographics
Demographics Kingsport vs Pahrump provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingsport | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 89 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kingsport vs Pahrump
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingsport at 3% compared to 2% in Pahrump.
- Kingsport has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 69% in Pahrump.
- In Pahrump, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Kingsport.
- Pahrump has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 3% in Kingsport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pahrump at 10%, compared to 4% in Kingsport.
- In Pahrump, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kingsport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingsport | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 30.7% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 23.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingsport vs Pahrump
- In Pahrump, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 20.3% in Kingsport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingsport at 30.7% compared to 24.4% in Pahrump.
- Pahrump has a higher smoking rate at 23.0% compared to 22.2% in Kingsport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pahrump at 15.9% compared to 13.8% in Kingsport.
- Pahrump has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 37.0% in Kingsport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 21.0% in Kingsport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingsport | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (359) | 1.1% (507) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (10,481) | 23.0% (10,287) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (7,995) | 20.5% (9,157) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.6% (12,103) | 10.1% (4,495) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingsport vs Pahrump
- In Pahrump, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Kingsport.
- In Pahrump, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 18.7% in Kingsport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pahrump at 20.5%, compared to 14.2% in Kingsport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 10.1% in Pahrump.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.