Demographics details for Kingsport, TN vs Graceville, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingsport, TN vs Graceville, FL.
| Data | Kingsport | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,150 | 2,175 |
| Median Age | 44.6 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $48,228 | $36,625 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Kingsport vs Graceville
- In Kingsport, the population is higher at 56,150, compared to 2,175 in Graceville.
- Residents in Kingsport have a higher median age of 44.6 years compared to 31.7 years in Graceville.
- Kingsport has a higher median income of $48,228 compared to $36,625 in Graceville.
- In Graceville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Kingsport.
- The poverty level is higher in Graceville at 18%, compared to 13% in Kingsport.
- The unemployment rate in Kingsport is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Graceville.
Demographics
Demographics Kingsport vs Graceville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingsport | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 32 |
| White | 89 | 59 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingsport vs Graceville
- In Graceville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 3% in Kingsport.
- Kingsport has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 59% in Graceville.
- Both Kingsport and Graceville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Graceville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Kingsport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingsport at 4% compared to 2% in Graceville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingsport and Graceville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingsport | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 30.7% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 24.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingsport vs Graceville
- More residents in Kingsport report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.6% in Graceville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingsport at 30.7% compared to 22.2% in Graceville.
- Graceville has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 22.2% in Kingsport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Graceville at 15.8% compared to 13.8% in Kingsport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingsport at 37.0% compared to 33.6% in Graceville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingsport at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Graceville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingsport | Graceville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (359) | 2.7% (58) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (10,481) | 25.3% (550) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (7,995) | 22.5% (490) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.6% (12,103) | 15.2% (331) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingsport vs Graceville
- In Graceville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.6% in Kingsport.
- In Graceville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 18.7% in Kingsport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Graceville at 22.5%, compared to 14.2% in Kingsport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 15.2% in Graceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.