Demographics details for Kingsport, TN vs Culver city, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Kingsport, TN vs Culver city, CA.

Data Kingsport Culver city
Population 56,150 39,515
Median Age 44.6 years 41.5 years
Median Income $48,228 $114,429
Married Families 38.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 13% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.8

Population Comparison: Kingsport vs Culver city

  • In Kingsport, the population is higher at 56,150, compared to 39,515 in Culver city.
  • Residents in Kingsport have a higher median age of 44.6 years compared to 41.5 years in Culver city.
  • Culver city has a higher median income of $114,429, compared to $48,228 in Kingsport.
  • In Culver city, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Kingsport.
  • Kingsport has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Culver city.
  • Culver city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.2% in Kingsport.

Demographics

Demographics Kingsport vs Culver city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Kingsport Culver city
Black 3 8
White 89 38
Asian 1 18
Hispanic 3 21
Two or More Races 4 15
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Kingsport vs Culver city

  • In Culver city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Kingsport.
  • Kingsport has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 38% in Culver city.
  • In Culver city, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 1% in Kingsport.
  • Culver city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 3% in Kingsport.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Culver city at 15%, compared to 4% in Kingsport.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingsport and Culver city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Kingsport Culver city
Mental Health Not Good 20.3% 13.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.9% 8.1%
Depression 30.7% 15.2%
Smoking 22.2% 7.5%
Binge Drinking 13.8% 16.5%
Obesity 37.0% 24.1%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Kingsport vs Culver city

  • More residents in Kingsport report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 13.1% in Culver city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Kingsport at 30.7% compared to 15.2% in Culver city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Kingsport at 22.2% compared to 7.5% in Culver city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Culver city at 16.5% compared to 13.8% in Kingsport.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Kingsport at 37.0% compared to 24.1% in Culver city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Kingsport at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Culver city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Kingsport Culver city
No Schooling 0.6% (359) 1.3% (501)
High School Diploma 18.7% (10,481) 7.6% (3,000)
Less than High School 14.2% (7,995) 9.1% (3,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.6% (12,103) 49.0% (19,344)

Education Levels Comparison: Kingsport vs Culver city

  • In Culver city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Kingsport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Kingsport hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 7.6% in Culver city.
  • More residents in Kingsport have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 9.1% in Culver city.
  • In Culver city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.0% compared to 21.6% in Kingsport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.