Demographics details for Kingsland, TX vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingsland, TX vs Lexington, NC.
| Data | Kingsland | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,075 | 19,679 |
| Median Age | 52.3 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $54,366 | $36,868 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Kingsland vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 7,075 in Kingsland.
- Residents in Kingsland have a higher median age of 52.3 years compared to 38.6 years in Lexington.
- Kingsland has a higher median income of $54,366 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingsland at 43.0% compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 9% in Kingsland.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Kingsland.
Demographics
Demographics Kingsland vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingsland | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 31 |
| White | 67 | 38 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingsland vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 1% in Kingsland.
- Kingsland has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Kingsland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kingsland at 19% compared to 16% in Lexington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingsland at 12% compared to 11% in Lexington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingsland and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingsland | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.1% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 26.8% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingsland vs Lexington
- More residents in Kingsland report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 19.2% in Lexington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingsland at 26.8% compared to 25.0% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 21.9% in Kingsland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingsland at 17.9% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 38.2% in Kingsland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingsland at 24.0% compared to 18.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingsland | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (94) | 2.7% (531) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,363) | 17.0% (3,355) |
| Less than High School | 22.2% (1,568) | 25.6% (5,036) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (1,325) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingsland vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.3% in Kingsland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsland hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 25.6%, compared to 22.2% in Kingsland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.