Demographics details for Kingsland, GA vs New cambria, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingsland, GA vs New cambria, KS.
| Data | Kingsland | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,896 | 104 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 30.7 years |
| Median Income | $73,839 | $83,601 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Kingsland vs New cambria
- In Kingsland, the population is higher at 19,896, compared to 104 in New cambria.
- Residents in Kingsland have a higher median age of 33.1 years compared to 30.7 years in New cambria.
- New cambria has a higher median income of $83,601, compared to $73,839 in Kingsland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingsland at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in New cambria.
- The poverty level is identical in both Kingsland and New cambria at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Kingsland is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in New cambria.
Demographics
Demographics Kingsland vs New cambria provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kingsland | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 21 | Data is updating |
| White | 60 | 96 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kingsland vs New cambria
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kingsland at 21% compared to 0% in New cambria.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New cambria at 96% compared to 60% in Kingsland.
- Both Kingsland and New cambria have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kingsland at 8% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kingsland at 9% compared to 1% in New cambria.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kingsland and New cambria at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kingsland | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingsland vs New cambria
- More residents in Kingsland report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.3% in New cambria.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kingsland at 21.8% compared to 20.8% in New cambria.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingsland at 17.3% compared to 16.5% in New cambria.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New cambria at 20.0% compared to 16.1% in Kingsland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingsland at 36.1% compared to 33.7% in New cambria.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New cambria at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Kingsland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kingsland | New cambria |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (51) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (3,105) | 18.3% (19) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (1,175) | 3.8% (4) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (2,616) | 8.7% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingsland vs New cambria
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsland have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in New cambria.
- In New cambria, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 15.6% in Kingsland.
- More residents in Kingsland have less than a high school education at 5.9% compared to 3.8% in New cambria.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingsland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 8.7% in New cambria.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.